| 
						 Home 
						About the author 
						Gentleman crusader 
						List of articles 
						Books 
						Jamila Verghese 
						  
						  
						 
  | 
					  | 
        
            
              The problems in Punjab and Harayna  and the Cauvery basin largely stem from these factors, especially insistence on  the paddy-wheat-sugarcane cycle rather than crop diversification, and antique  systems of flood irrigation in the Tanjore delta 
                      
                 | 
             
             
          New Charter for Water
          	Waiting for the rains – again – as climate change takes it toll. It is time to start managing India’s water future. 
            By B G Verghese 
            Hindustan Times, July 2009  
            Sweltering heat and parched lands have marked the country’s  anxious vigil for the rains that have played truant for weeks while prayers  have been said. It was said at one time that Indian agriculture was a gamble in  the monsoon. That was when traditional agriculture was practiced and, with  limited irrigation, was monsoon dependant. With the growth of irrigation and  new crop varieties and technologies Indian agriculture appeared to be  reasonably drought-proof. The gamble has returned with climate change – a long  term secular change in rainfall patterns going beyond the shorter term  hydrological cycles with which we have long been familiar. 
            The SW and NE precipitation bring rain and flood from excess  runoff, part of which is trapped in underground aquifers and more of which can  be stored through induced recharge and rainwater and rooftop harvesting,  watershed management and storages ranging from ponds and bandhs to larger storages behind multipurpose dams. The winter  westerlies bring snow to the northern latitudes and serve as a savings deposit  with a delayed discharge of snow and glacial melt with rising temperatures  through the spring and summer. This is the new hydrological cycle affected by  global warming and climate change that we must learn to live with and manage.  Most storages, Bhakra-Pong for example, are depleted in relation to annual  averages and there has been less snowmelt. Glacier recession in the Himalaya  and Karakoram implies higher glacial melt that will provide short term  wellbeing after which summer discharges will drop significantly. Lower runoff and diminished storages also  entail loss of hydropower which could otherwise be used to lift groundwater,  where available, and for industrial and cooling purposes. 
            India  is a wasteful user of water and energy, with foolish politicians encouraging  waste and misuse through free or concessional water to the “poor” (which seldom  reaches them). This has invariably resulted in poor or no maintenance resulting  in asset deterioration. The Government has followed a strategy of supply  augmentation (necessary in a rapidly expanding economy) while ignoring the  related and supremely important strategy of conservation through demand  management. The country boasts some fine irrigation and power engineers but  they are trained and devote most of their attention to supply augmentation  whereas “supply” could perhaps be augmented by as much as a third or more at a  mere fraction of the cost by suitable demand management, more appropriate  cropping patterns and pricing policies, better use of better technology (drip,  sprinkler, recycling, improved maintenance, more efficient lighting systems),  and superior regulatory mechanisms that are not handicapped by political  interference. 
            The problems in Punjab and Harayna  and the Cauvery basin largely stem from these factors, especially insistence on  the paddy-wheat-sugarcane cycle rather than crop diversification, and antique  systems of flood irrigation in the Tanjore delta. The argument about big and  small dams, raindrop harvesting and surface and groundwater storage, especially  large dams, is misplaced and often ideological. Each has its place in an  ascending hierarchy. Large storages with huge catchments and commands provide a  degree of insurance and carry-over benefits that micro and mini schemes simply  do not provide. They have all to be worked in tandem through public-private  partnerships. If farmers/consumers have ownership of a water supply scheme, or  any segment of it, they will ensure efficient management, policing, maintenance  and collection of service charges. Hence the importance of participatory  irrigation management, which is evident in groundwater schemes. 
            Aberrant weather must be expected with climate change, with  episodic cloudbursts such as drowned Mumbai, Bangalore and Chennai some years  ago and per contra (surprise, surprise) caused drought in Assam and the  Northeast in some of the historically wettest regions in the world. In this  situation, the rainfall must be captured when and where it falls with  destructive flood “surpluses” caught behind dams. Further, given spatial and  seasonal variations in rainfall patterns, water can and must be moved from  “surplus” to “deficit” regions over time and space. This is what storage  irrigation does, augmented by inter-basin and trans-basin transfers, a hoary  practice in India  and around the world. This how the unimaginatively-named Inter-Linking of  Rivers proposal was conceptualized, but never envisaged as a single mammoth  “project” except by uninformed politicians, judges and critics who combined to  conjure up a myth that did no service to the basic idea. “ILR” survives and,  apart from the Ken-Betwa link two other West coast northward trans-basin  diversions in Gujarat are under study. 
            Since rivers flow across national and internal political  boundaries, they must be seen and planned in terms of natural resource regions.  The Constitution provides for river basin authorities but these have never been  pursued on account of parochial political feuding, often resulting in wasteful  schemes being taken up to pre-empt any raid on alleged surpluses. One brave  effort, the DVC, was killed by West Bengal within less  than a decade of its launching. Maybe the institution of water markets (with  independent regulators to oversee suitable safeguards for weaker players) and  water parliaments (that bring together upper and lower riparians across river  basins with statutory safeguards), could provide answers. 
            International rivers (the Indus, Ganga  and Brahmaputra-Meghna systems) can also only be developed optimally through  regional cooperation. Here new strategies must be devised, including joint  management and operation of sensitive projects. The Tipaimukh multipurpose  project in Manipur, which could immensely benefit Bangladesh  too, suggests itself as a good candidate. The scare about Chinese plans to  divert the Brahmaputra northwards is a piece of  uninformed nonsense. More to the point, the Government should urge Pakistan  to move forward on Indus-II, providing for joint exploration, construction,  operation and management of the Upper Indus basin on  both sides of the LOC to ward off the common peril of climate change. 
            Meanwhile, if the delayed rains spread next week as expected  and the country gets 85-95 per cent of July-September rainfall, drought can be  averted with alternative cropping patterns and staggered load-shedding.  Advancing the clock by 60-90 minutes for daylight saving could yield some  dividends too while an expanded NREGA could stave off hunger and help build  farm capital assets. 
            Finally, long term water management in India dictates a restructuring of the Ministry of Water  Resources, the Central Water Commission, and related agencies which are old  fashioned supply-side organizations that lack the inter-disciplinary competence  required to manage India’s water future.  |